Infosek
INFOSEK

How to Build a Record of Processing for DPDP

No rule requires this document by name. Three rules require things you cannot do without it, which amounts to the same thing.

How to Build a Record of Processing for DPDP

Why build it if no rule names it

Three obligations collapse without it:

The fields that earn their place

The copies are the hard part

Most organisations can list their primary databases. What breaks a rights request is the copies: the analytics warehouse, the CSV someone exported, the support tool that caches customer records, the backup that still holds data erased from production.

Recording where data flows, not just where it originates, is the difference between an inventory that works under pressure and one that looks complete.

The inventory is not a compliance artefact. It is the thing that lets you answer, in the first hour of an incident, which people were affected.

Infosek Team

Keeping it current

Common questions

Does the DPDP Act require a record of processing activities?

Not by that name. But Rule 7 requires describing the extent of a breach, Rule 8 requires erasing data once the specified purpose is no longer served, and Rule 14 requires handling Data Principal rights requests. None of those is achievable without an inventory of what personal data is held, where, and for what purpose.

What should a DPDP data inventory contain?

At minimum: the data set, the personal data fields in it, the specified purpose, the lawful basis, the systems it lives in, who can access it, any Data Processor involved, the retention period and the law or purpose justifying it, and whether it leaves India.

Starting your data mapping?

Infosek handles the whole of DPDP: data mapping, consent and notices, security controls, vendor contracts, breach readiness and the audit itself. We do the work, not just the gap report.

Book Free 30-Min Assessment